BRAVE MAG

ShowBiz & Sports

Hot

Friday, April 24, 2026

Hegseth says Iran war is Trump’s ‘gift to the world’ as he berates Europe and Asia for ‘freeriding’

April 24, 2026
Hegseth says Iran war is Trump’s ‘gift to the world’ as he berates Europe and Asia for ‘freeriding’

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth lashed out at American allies Friday for not committing naval forcesforcibly re-open the Strait of Hormuzafter Iran shut down the key waterway in retaliation against the U.S.-Israeli attacks.

The Independent US

During a Pentagon briefing with Joint Chiefs of Staff chair General Dan Caine, Hegseth implied thatEuropean and Asian countries were not sufficiently gratefulfor the U.S.-led war, which he called “a gift to the world” from PresidentDonald Trump, citing the administration's purported goal of preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons.

“It's a bold and dangerous mission ... courtesy of a bold and historic president,” Hegseth said.

The defense secretary claimed the U.S. Navy's “ironclad blockade” on Iranian ports would be “going global” and “tightening by the hour” to prevent any ships from entering or leaving Iran's territorial waters absent U.S. permission.

At the same time, he accused Iranian forces of “acting like terrorists” by attempting to enforce their own blockade of the waterway against “random ships" and laying "indiscriminate mines" in the strait.

During a Pentagon briefing with Joint Chiefs of Staff chair General Dan Caine, Hegseth implied that European and Asian countries were not sufficiently grateful for the U.S.-led war, which he called “a gift to the world” from President Donald Trump, citing the administration's purported goal of preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons (Getty)

"Iran's battered military ... has been reduced to a gang of pirates with a flag. They cloak their aggression in slogans, but the world now sees them for what they are — criminals on the high seas," he said.

“We are in control. Nothing in, nothing out,” Hegseth added.

Although the ex-television presenter turned defense chief claimed the U.S. has blockaded the Strait of Hormuz, American ships have not been operating in that narrow passage because doing so would put them in range of Iranian drone or missile attacks.

Instead, American forces in the Gulf of Oman and the Indian Ocean have been intercepting ships bound for or originating from Iranian ports since earlier this month as a way of restricting Iranian revenue from both oil exports and Tehran’s efforts to extract massive tolls from ships seeking to pass through the strait.

Iranian forces have effectively blockaded the strait since the start of the U.S.-Israeli bombing campaign, cutting off approximately 20 percent of the world’s oil supply from markets and sending petroleum prices to levels not seen in years.

Tehran has also placed mines in the strait and has seized or attacked ships transiting through it, leading to a massive buildup of idle ships and raising fears of shortages of fuel and other products in regions that rely heavily on imports and exports through the strait.

Hegseth denigrated longtime U.S. allies in Europe and Asia for not joining in the American-Israeli war and claiming that they have more reason to want shipping traffic through the strait to resume because the U.S. “barely” makes use of it in comparison.

“Europe and Asia have benefited from our protection for decades, but the time for free riding is over. America and the free world deserve allies who are capable, who are loyal and who understand that being an ally is not a one way street. It's a two way street,” Hegseth said.

Advertisement

“We are not counting on Europe, but they need theStrait of Hormuzmuch more than we do, and might want to start doing less talking and having less fancy conferences in Europe and get in a boat.”

The defense secretary’s derisive comments towards U.S. allies come one week after the U.K. and France convened a 51-country summit on the situation in the Strait of Hormuz.

British Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and French President Emmanuel Macron announced that both countries would lead “an independent and strictly defensive multinational mission to protect merchant vessels, reassure commercial shipping operators, and conduct mine clearance operations.”

Starmer and Macron said in a statement that the multinational effort would commence “as soon as conditions permit” but only after implementation of a “sustainable ceasefire agreement.”

The defense secretary claimed the U.S. Navy had an ‘ironclad blockade’ on the Strait of Hormuz (Reuters)

While a long-term deal appears far off, earlier this week Trump announced that he would continue to honor a temporary ceasefire deal that had been set to expire Wednesday after Pakistani leaders prevailed on him to do so rather than resume attacks on targets inside Iran. But the president told reporters he’s in no hurry to make a deal with Tehran, insisting that he has “all the time in the world” to do so.

During a question-and-answer session with a handpicked selection of right-wing reporters who’d been given front-row seats at the Pentagon press conference, Hegseth said the blockade would last “as long as it takes” while belittling Starmer and Macron’s efforts as “a lot of talks” and mocking the multinational summit as “a silly conference in Europe last week where they got together and talked about, talking about maybe doing something eventually, when things are done.”

He similarly slammed the proposed multinational force as “not serious efforts” because they would not involve offensive operations against Iranian forces while claiming the U.S. would “welcome a serious European effort to do something about this straight and this passage, considering it's their energy capabilities that are most at stake.”

Hegseth’s repeated belittling of America’s traditional allies is in line with the president’s repeated expressions of disdain for NATO after the 32-member defensive alliance did not join in the offensive war he started on February 28 alongside Israel without consulting or requesting help from other members of the alliance.

Trump has since then repeatedly mocked NATO as a “paper tiger” and claimed members “weren’t there for us” despite the fact that the alliance’s mutual defense provision has only been invoked to defend the U.S. in the wake of the September 11, 2001 terror attacks on New York and Washington.

As Iran’s retaliatory blockade of the Strait of Hormuz has caused global oil prices to spike and Trump’s approval rating to sink ahead of the November midterm elections in the U.S., the president and his aides have been considering how to punish NATO members for not joining the U.S.-led war.

Trump has mused aloud about withdrawing the U.S. from NATO — a course of action that would be prohibited under a 2021 law authored by Secretary of State Marco Rubio during his time as a Florida senator — and a leaked Pentagon memorandum first reported on by Reuters suggests retaliating against the U.K. by purportedly “reviewing” British claims to the Falkland Islands.

The State Department’s website states that the islands are administered by the UK but are still claimed by Argentina, whose libertarian president, Javier Milei, is a Trump ally.

In response, a spokesperson for Starmer pointed out that Falklanders “have hugely voted overwhelmingly in favor of remaining a UK overseas territory.”

“The question of the Falkland Islands and the UK’s sovereignty and the islanders’ right to self-determination is not in question, and we’ve expressed that position clearly and consistently,” the spokesperson added.

Read More

Thursday, April 23, 2026

Prince Louis Turns 8! See His New Birthday Portrait

April 23, 2026
Prince Louis Turns 8! See His New Birthday Portrait

Prince Louis turned 8 years old on April 23

People Prince Louis in his birthday portraitCredit: Matt Porteous

NEED TO KNOW

  • Kate Middleton and Prince William celebrated their youngest son's big day by sharing a new royal portrait of Louis

  • Louis' older sister, Princess Charlotte, turns 11 in May, while big brother Prince George turns 13 in July

Happy birthday,Prince Louis!

Kate MiddletonandPrince William's youngest child celebrated his eighth birthday on Thursday, April 23. The family marked the occasion by continuing a royal tradition, sharing a new photo of the young prince.

The picture was taken in Cornwall earlier this month by Matt Porteous.

The Prince and Princess of Wales release a portrait of each of their three children —Prince George, 12,Princess Charlotte, 10, and Prince Louis — every year as a way of acknowledging well-wishers who reach out to wish them a happy birthday. While professional photographers sometimes take the snaps for the family,Kate, 44, has also gotten behind the camerafor the annual photos.

Prince Louis portrait for his 8th birthday taken in Cornwall in April 2026Credit: Matt Porteous

Last year's birthday portraitmarked a notable, grown-up change for Louis. In addition to missing his two front teeth, he was also wearing jeans,marking the first timethat the young prince wore long pants rather than shorts in a birthday picture.

It's classic fashion for upper-class boys in Britain to wear shorts with knee socks instead of pants —even in cold weather. Both Prince William, 43, andPrince Harry, 41, wore shorts with long socks when they were young, and Prince George and Prince Louis continued the trend into the next generation.

Advertisement

Can't get enough of PEOPLE's Royals coverage? Sign up forour free Royals newsletterto get the latest updates on Kate Middleton, Meghan Markle and more!

Royal watchers couldn't help but notice that the youngest Wales sibling looked even more grown-up duringhis first public appearance this year. He and Prince George matched their father in dark blue suits, white shirts and light blue ties as the royal family stepped out for Easter Matins Service at St. George's Chapel, located on the grounds of Windsor Castle.

Princess Charlotte, Kate Middleton, Prince George, Prince Louis and Prince William attend Easter service at St. George's Chapel on April 5, 2026Credit: Max Mumby/Indigo/Getty

There are some big changes ahead for the Prince and Princess of Wales' family this year. Prince George turns 13 in July and will continue his education at a new school. The frontrunners are thought to be Eton College, William's alma mater, or Marlborough College, where Kate attended, while Charlotte and Louis continue at Lambrook School.

Prince Louis, with his mom Princess Kate at Westminster Abbey in December 2025Credit: Aaron Chown - Pool/Getty

Despite the fact that George ison a unique path as the eventual heir to the throne, a royal biographer recently said thatPrince William— in the midst of a years-long feud with his own brother,Prince Harry—is committed toavoiding the "spare problem"with his younger children.

"I am told that the heir to the throne, Prince William, is preoccupied with the built-in risk of primogeniture’s cruelty,"Princess Dianabiographer and formerVanity Faireditor-in-chief Tina Brown wrote in a March installment of her Substack,Fresh Hell.

"He is determined that his second- and third-born children, Princess Charlotte and Prince Louis, are well-prepared and well-financed for independent lives and will not fall into the same cycle of thwarted freedom," alleged the author ofThe Diana Chronicles.

Read the original article onPeople

Read More

“Survivor 50” recap: Jimmy Fallon just punked Jeff Probst on national TV

April 23, 2026
“Survivor 50” recap: Jimmy Fallon just punked Jeff Probst on national TV

Jimmy Fallon peer pressured Jeff Probst into competing in a "Survivor" challenge… with mixed results.

Entertainment Weekly Jeff Probst on 'Survivor 50'Credit: Robert Voets/CBS

Key Points

  • But Fallon was not done! Can't stop, won't stop! He also put his name on a new twist that helped take out a prominent player while completely rewriting the rules of the game.

  • Cirie is playing the best game so far, and it's not even really close.

With apologies toAngelina Keeley,Jimmy Fallonmay actually be the master negotiator when it comes toSurvivor. The wayJeff Probsttells it, he wanted theTonight Showhost to be part of hisSurvivor 50celebritypalooza(spearfishing optional). But Fallon, suddenly drunk with late night hosting power, cut some sort of deal that he would only do it if Probst took him up on his idea to compete in aSurvivorchallenge alongside contestants.

There is a good reason why Probst would resist such an idea. And that reason is that the host actually competing in aSurvivorchallenge against contestants is completely absurd. WHICH IS ALSO THE EXACT REASON TO GO AND DO IT!

I’ve said it countless times before, and the evidence just keeps piling up: Probst has entered his weird era. And I remain absolutely here for it. Bring on the raps. Cue up some new impressions. Can we get one of the Journeys to just be tea time with Probst? (And then the tea gets pulled out of your hand and into the ocean if you don’t drink it fast enough?) It’s all so wonderfully bizarre, and the fact that the Hostmaster General has initiated IDGAF mode gives me a level of hilarious joy that I was honestly not sure could be achieved while watching a reality competition show.

But it could have been even better! And this, I blame on the contestants. Probst began the proceedings by taking out a knife and threatening to “pull a Keoni,” which I always thought was being super smooth and handsome and making all the women in theSurvivorpress corpsswoon, but also apparently means repeatedly stabbing bags of rice. However, the host had another idea.

Jeff Probst on 'Survivor 50'Credit: CBS

“I too am a fan ofSurvivor,” he announced. (I would certainly hope so.) “So I have an idea I would like to put in the game. In the spirit ofIn the Hands of the Fans, I will put the rice back up on the line, but only if five of you are willing to make a side bet… with me.” He went on to announce, “I’m running today’s challenge. You want to earn your rice, you’re going to do it by outlasting me.”

He then explained that he wanted five players to take a side bet, and if all five of them outlasted him, they got the rice. The whiny contestants immediately started complaining about the terms of the deal, explaining that they were all depleted and that Probst had a shower… although I’m not sure how much that last point plays into anything. Probst countered that he was older than all of them and had no game incentive to win. Fair.

Exclusive video, interviews, breaking news, games, polls, and more!

Eventually,Jonathanbargained Probst down to four people he had to beat. But why not go even further? Even if the players did not know the full extent of Probst’s shady backroom deal with Fallon, it was clear that the host really,reallywanted to compete in this particular challenge. Why not take advantage of that and go down to three, maybe two, possibly even just one person? I mean, on one hand, I would have been bummed had this strategy not worked because I was at this point obsessed with seeing the host compete for no reason in aSurvivorchallenge, but I was evenmoreobsessed with watching what our beloved master of ceremonies would have done if the players had been all “Nah, we’re good” and deflated every single molecule of air out of that ballon.

He was already committed! The deal with Fallon was already in place! So had the contestants called his bluff, would Probst have still competed with absolutely nothing on the line? Would he have jumped on a boat to go dump that Journey puzzle into the ocean and rip up Fallon’s parchment before anyone else could get there? Or would he have just stood there awkwardly calling the entire challenge while standing next to a whole contraptionwith an absurdly long ropethat was never even used? THESE ARE ALL FANTASTIC OPTIONS! It was a no-lose situation for us viewers. Hilarity would have ensued Choose Your Adventure Style no matter what page you turned to.

Jeff Probst and the cast of

Alas, the bargainwasstruck at four and the challenge commenced with Probst needing to beat Jonathan,Joe,Ozzy,andTiffanyto deny them the rice. In the end, he could not bestanyof them, and maybe that’s the headline on his performance and we can all make fun of him for bowing out after seven-and-a-half-minutes. That certainly would be a lot more fun. But that is also conveniently ignoring that hedidbeatRizo(almost 40 years younger),Emily,Rick, andCirie.

Contrary to Probst’s claims that he was letting down his entire crew, that’s a more-than-respectable showing for a then-63-year-old. It was fun watching the cast razz him and throw some of his previous play-by-play commentary back in his face. Of course, the best part was the montage of clips showing Probst tearing into poor challenge performances of the past, calling them pathetic and noting at one point noting that “You need to stop bitching and start throwing.” (Notice all these clips were from old-eraSurvivor, when the host unleashed a much sharper tongue while calling the action.)

So it’s not like Fallon exactly screwed over his buddy by making him put his reputation on the line in a physical competition. But there was another person whodefinitelyfelt screwed over by the comedian’s intrusion intoSurvivor 50. Let’s get into that and everything else on episode 9 ofSurvivor 50.

Tricky Ricky

Viewers may have been impressed by Rick’s fake idolmove at Tribal Council last week, but the players — both allies and adversaries alike — were far less fawning. Jonathan mocked Devens’ ego boost. Joe apparently contracted the impersonation virus that ravaged Probst’s body a few weeks back and started imitating Rick’s idol retrieval antics. And Cirie’s Rizard of Oz alliance (that’s just a terrible nickname, by the way) were all marveling at how dumb Devens’ move was because it put a huge target right on his back.

“Devens’ actions at Tribal just was perfect,” Cirie explained. “I loved every second of it. He just made a bullseye on his back, and anybody that has a bigger target than me is beneficial to me in this game.”

Even Rick’s alleged ally was annoyed. “I am angry at Rick because he put our entire alliance in jeopardy with his antics,” noted Emily. “Because now it’s target number one.” (I literally screamed “NOOOOOOOO!” at my TV set like some sort of lunatic when Rick informed Emily that the idol was not, in fact, real. From what we’ve seen this season, telling Emilyanythingis akin to just broadcasting it to the entire tribe on a coconut speaker phone.)

However, it’s hard to blame Rick for making his fake idol move. My understanding from having talked to several different people on both sides of the vote is that it still would have beenCoachandChrissygoing to the jury even without the Devens fake idol play. However, it definitely would have been a closer vote. And if you’re sitting there in Rick’s shoes knowing votes are coming your way, and also knowing people lie for a living out there so you can’t truly knowhow manyparchments will have your name on them, then you kindahaveto make the move and deal with the fallout later. And as we saw, there were other bigger targets to take out anyway.

Advertisement

Rick Devens on 'Survivor 50'Credit: CBS

Jimmy’s Journey

Joe won immunity, holding a bucket containing 25 percent of his pregame body weight the longest, but he won something else as well — the power to pick someone to go on a Journey.

Man, I do not like what Joe did here at all. Instead of making a strategic decision, he just asked who wanted to go and then told all who raised their hands to play rock, paper, scissors to determine who won. LAME! Make a decision, my man! Put some thought and strategy behind it! Even though it ended up working out to their advantage, you can’t be purely results-based when evaluating this decision-making process. That fact that Joe allowed one of the few people (Christian) his alliance didnotwant to have an opportunity to win an advantage to go do exactly that is inexplicable. Not a fan.

As for the Journey, it was aRachel LaMontspecial, with a puzzle that would get pulled into the ocean if you did not finish it fast enough — seriously one of the coolest inventions ever for the show. Watching those anchors and ropes get pulled into the deep ratchets up the tension and pressure a hundred times over. And the shots of the objects falling into the abyss are so epic. Love it. This time, it was a seemingly simpleSurvivorlogo puzzle, and with puzzle-masterChristian Hubickiat the controls, it appeared to be an easy done deal.

A note that began all casual-like with “Hey, it’s Jimmy Fallon…” informed Christian that if he succeed in solving the puzzle while there was still a puzzle to solve, that he would get to vote for a player right then and there so they would have already have a vote against them in the urn and have no idea it was there. Let’s break down this advantage should it be won. This is a great wrinkle. In fact, the only thing I don’t like about it is the goofy name (“The Jimmy Fallon One in the Urn”).

Christian Hubicki on 'Survivor 50'Credit: Robert Voets/CBS

The first part of Christian having to vote for someone without any conversations with his alliance partners and having no idea what was going on back at camp is kind of delicious. And while a single vote in a tribe this large would not be likely to carry that much importance, it still had the potential to cause confusion, and possibly, hurt feelings if it did not match up to the vote later.

I think it’s super inventive and fun. We’ll get to the losing part twist in a bit, but first, are you as shocked as I was that Christian failed in this puzzle? It’s been a mixed bag for the professor on puzzles this season. We’ve seen some successes, but some big loses as well. I thought he had this one in the bag for sure. I thought wrong. And he looked absolutely despondent, informing us, “I don’t think people realize how often people who you think are smart people feel stupid. We try to keep it to ourselves. But here, you can’t.”

You want to know what would be considered stupid in mostSurvivorparts? Voting yourself out of the game. But it turned out after his loss that it was exactly what Christian would be forced to do.  He was instructed (by Fallon, I guess???)  to open up an envelope in front of the entire tribe and inform them that he had to vote for himself at Tribal Council. As much as I loved the winning option of this twist, I don’t know if I can get down with the losing punishment of having to write your own name down to be voted out of the game. And why in the name of Tata the Bushman did he have to reveal to everyone his punishment? Those Journey losses are usually a mystery to spin however one sees fit, but for some weird reason Christian was forced to announce his penalty… which only assured his downfall.

Maybe I am just being too OG on his one, but having to vote yourself out at Tribal Council seems like such a fundamentally wrong thing to do within the structure of the game. It is actually against the rules and not something you are allowed to do. I wouldn’t have had an issue if it said a vote would automatically appear in the urn with his name on it. But the act of making a player —anyplayer — physically write his or her own name down just doesn’t sit right with me. I’m not going to make a big stink about it, but it feels like something that should remain off-limits. (Plus, I don’t like the fact that having to vote for yourself also took away any chance of a Shot in the Dark play, making it a far greater punishment than the reward of putting a vote in the urn should you have solved the puzzle.) But I guess that’s what makes me an old fuddy duddy.

Christian Hubicki on 'Survivor 50'Credit: Robert Voets/CBS

Cirie runs circles around the competition (again)

There’s a misconception that a strong social game onSurvivoris just getting people to like you and not wanting to vote you off, while still liking you enough at the end to hand you $1 million — and sure, that is a huge component of it. But the other, equally important facet that often gets overlooked is the ability to make everyone believe you are on their side while successfully hiding your true allegiance.

Everyone knew from the jump how aligned Rick and Christian were, and it has cost them. All the honor and integrity people have seemingly done a terrible job of obscuring their true island BFFs. And then there is Cirie. Last week, it was Chrissy pushing Cirie to oust Rizo, having no idea how aligned they were… in turn, cementing her own ouster. And this week you had both Christian and Emily pitching an Ozzy blindside to Ozzy’s biggest ally. And Cirie played along brilliantly both times. She didn’t sit there and try to argue for his safety, which may have set off alarm bells. She acted like she thought it was a good idea before working behind the scenes to do the exact opposite and take out the person who suggested it. She even took part in Christina’s goofy decision to refer to Ozzy like he was freakin’ Voldemort or the guitarist from the Dwarves.

The fact that no one had a clue that Cirie was aligned that closely with Rizo or Ozzy is stunning, especially since Emily and Christian were on original Cila with both Cirie and Ozzy so would have had the most insight to their dynamic.

Cirie Fields on 'Survivor 50'Credit: Robert Voets/CBS

As we went into Tribal Council, the only question was whether it would be Emily or Christian who paid the ultimate price for attempting to oust Cirie’s number one. Tiffany was insistent on Emily, while Rizo was pushing hard for Hubicki because he could win immunities and could not play his Shot in the Dark due to having to cast a vote for himself. Hard to argue against that logic. It’s also hard to argue against that silver suit that Coach was wearing to Tribal Council. Did you see that thing? More likeFashionSlayer, am I right? Impeccable.

Christian took every chance he could during Tribal to smack-talk Fallon for smacking him right out of the game, although his fate may have been sealed once he pitched He Who Should Not Be Named to Cirie. And while I am giving Cirie massive credit for this move, I also want to give the R-I-Z-G-O-D some props. Not for any game play, mind you, but if you watch the slow-motion clips of the votes being cast during Christian’s final words, you will see Rizo appearing to do the robot while voting out the robotics professor. Solid attention to detail. But seriously, I am flabbergasted that we are now nine episodes in and THE ONLY PERSON WHO HAS SEEMED THE LEAST BIT CONCERNED WITH TAKING OUT CIRIE WASJENNA LEWIS!!! #JennaWasRight.

Christian was the dominant personality of the pre-merge. Granted, that was mostly due to the fact that his tribes kept losing, but he engineered the first jaw-dropping move of the season when he took out his formerWhite LotusdirectorMike White. “I hope you enjoyed watching me play, because I enjoyed playing,” he said during his final words. I enjoyed watching you play, Christian. And I’ll enjoy breaking down the highs and lows of your game when we chat for our exit interview on Thursday morning.

As always, thanks for reading along, everybody. Go check out our latestSurvivor 50Mystery Boxarticle for some special exclusives as well as an examination of if we are getting aSurvivor 50Loved One visit or not. Meanwhile, I will go start preparing next week’s scoop of the crispy while remaining extremely nervous about the impending appearance of one MrBeast.

Want to be kept up with all things Survivor? Dig deep and sign up for Entertainment Weekly'sfree Survivor Weekly newsletterto have all the latest news, interviews, and commentary sent right to your inbox.

Read the original article onEntertainment Weekly

Read More